LinkedIn has opposed an Australian law limiting social media access for children under 16. The platform claims it doesn’t appeal to young users. Owned by Microsoft, LinkedIn argued to a Senate committee that its professional content is unlikely to attract minors.
The Australian government proposed the legislation to shield children from harmful social media effects. The law would block children under 16 from accessing platforms like TikTok and Instagram. LinkedIn believes it should be exempt, citing its professional user base and a minimum age requirement of 16.
LinkedIn removes underage accounts and focuses on networking and career topics, which rarely interest minors. The company insists its platform differs significantly from social networks targeting younger audiences.
Opposition from Tech Giants
LinkedIn’s stance contrasts with other major tech companies that strongly oppose the proposed law. Meta, Google, and Snap Inc. have raised concerns about its broad implications for their platforms and businesses.
TikTok expressed particular concern over implementing reliable age verification systems. It warned that the rushed legislation could lead to unintended consequences for users and platforms alike.
Why LinkedIn Says It Should Be Exempt
LinkedIn focuses on professional content and career networking, making it irrelevant to most users under 16. The platform enforces a minimum age policy and believes including it in the ban is unnecessary.
LinkedIn argues the law would create administrative burdens like added age-verification systems. These changes, it claims, would disrupt operations and increase costs without improving child safety.
Global Implications and Criticism
Australia’s proposed law has sparked global interest, with countries like the UK considering similar measures. France has already enacted laws requiring parental consent for social media use by children under 15.
Critics argue Australia’s bill lacks proper scrutiny and was fast-tracked without meaningful public consultation. Privacy concerns and the effectiveness of the legislation are major points of contention.
Despite criticism, the government plans to pass the law by year’s end, citing the need to protect children online. Governments worldwide are adopting stricter measures to address the risks of social media.