The Rising Influence of Carbon Capture Advocates
The Cop29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, has become a focal point for discussions on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Nearly 500 lobbyists representing CCS have been granted access to the summit, an increase from last year’s numbers, even as overall attendance has dropped significantly. Their presence has raised concerns about the influence of fossil fuel-aligned interests on the event’s climate agenda.
Among the CCS lobbyists, 55 were invited as guests by the Azerbaijani government, offering them unparalleled access to negotiations. This has sparked criticism from environmental groups who see CCS as a controversial technology that may detract from renewable energy initiatives.
The Promise of CCS Technology
CCS aims to capture CO2 emissions from industrial sources and store them underground, mitigating their impact on the atmosphere. Advocates argue it is a vital tool for addressing emissions in sectors where renewable alternatives are not yet viable, such as cement and chemicals.
Supporters emphasize CCS’s potential to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels and play a significant role in meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. Olivia Powis, CEO of the Carbon Capture & Storage Association, highlighted its importance in decarbonizing hard-to-transition industries while complementing renewable energy efforts.
Concerns Over Greenwashing and Delays
Critics of CCS are not convinced. They argue the technology has a mixed record, with many projects underperforming or failing outright. Furthermore, CCS is often used to extract more oil through a process known as enhanced oil recovery, reinforcing dependence on fossil fuels rather than phasing them out.
Environmental groups at Cop29 have labeled the promotion of CCS as “greenwashing.” Rachel Kennerley from the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) warned that focusing on CCS risks delaying the transition to renewables and wasting resources on expensive, unproven technology. She also raised safety concerns tied to large-scale CCS infrastructure.
Policy Implications and Lobbyist Influence
The significant presence of CCS representatives at Cop29 has fueled concerns about their role in shaping global climate policy. Negotiators are discussing carbon market rules under the Paris Agreement, including provisions for carbon credits tied to emissions reductions achieved through CCS.
Activists fear these policies could incentivize continued fossil fuel use rather than driving a full transition to clean energy. CIEL’s analysis reveals that many CCS lobbyists are closely tied to fossil fuel industries, further complicating their position in climate negotiations.
Charting the Future of Climate Action
The debate surrounding CCS at Cop29 highlights a broader tension in global climate strategies. Supporters see the technology as a necessary stopgap to bridge the gap between current energy systems and a sustainable future. Critics, however, argue that reliance on CCS risks perpetuating fossil fuel use at a time when urgent action is needed.
As Cop29 unfolds, decisions made at the summit will have lasting implications for the future of climate policy. The question remains: will global efforts focus on proven renewable solutions, or will emerging technologies like CCS take center stage despite their challenges?
Join the Conversation
What role should carbon capture technologies play in the fight against climate change? Are they an innovative solution, or do they risk slowing the transition to renewable energy? Share your perspectives below!
